Roleplaying » Discussions


Discussion: The Grimoire Challenge

  • Member
    October 12, 2018

     

    I know :D The Evil Overlord wont care but my Conjuration Scholar will do it ^^ 

  • October 13, 2018

    Now that's interesting. I've always thought that guys who practice necromancy or tinker with stuff from Oblivion have a somewhat... careless view on death. Which doesn't necessarily make them evil btw.

    I've played a Telvanni who was studying conjurstion and medicine, she believed that once a peson is dead they don't care what will happen with their body and felt free to do all what she wanted with corpses. Also she believed that since all mortals are going to die eventually, someone's death is not a big deal, be it with or without her being involved.

    So I'm curious as to how you'll make it work.

  • Member
    October 13, 2018

    Conjuration as in summoning deadra can be ok who cares about deadra anyway no love for them. :P

    But I believe that necromancy at least the necromancy used to raise people or even trap souls is what you would call bad or evil since it does harm to other people and torments their souls/spirits. Because the person/soul is suffering during the process. That is also the reason why when a zombie dies in Skyrim they might say "Thank you" or "At last" etc. Also, I don't remember the source but it is mentioned somewhere that in Altmer society only few that have permission will are able to legit study necromancy (most likely not the standard minion making machine one) and only in order to find ways to prolong mortal lifespan, other than that it is considered evil and not sure if it is banned but they despise it nonetheless not to mention about the other races.

    The only way I can see this working is to try and balance the bad with good like using necromancy (if that is what will be used) but only doing the good guy things and have the character torn and hate his power but being his only weapon to do good for the world of the living or something along these lines. Because being a necromancer you would know what kind of torment the souls are going through while you summon or raise them.

  • Member
    October 13, 2018

    I'd argue that it depends on the type of necromancy being used as to whether it is good or "evil". This discussion is a pretty good explanation of the various ways you can reanimate the dead in TES. If you don't want to read it then I'll summarise it here: first way is using the soul of the individual being raised, second is stuffing a daedra into the body, and third is more down to how you interpret the lore since it takes part of a lore book and suggests that you can raise a body with only the "energy" part of the soul and not the "person" part. So in the case of the second (and third if you like that interpretation) it's really not that much different to other conjuration spells. Oh, also the person's soul only suffers if the necromancer has to fight them for control of their body, so presumably if you are using a daedra to raise them or the third option then there would be no torment.

    The Altmer in ESO Summerset also have a spell which lets them see the final actions of the dead which they use in solving murders.

    I also like to "twist" Arkay's teachings somewhat, "Arkay's Blessing prevents the souls of men, beastmen, and elves from being used without consent." Without consent is the important part here, is it evil and immoral to raise a body of a person who has given you permission to do so? 

     

  • October 13, 2018

    Duvain said:

    Conjuration as in summoning deadra can be ok who cares about deadra anyway no love for them. :P

    It's not about the Daedra themselves but about bringing them into the world. Same goes for bound and Daedric weapons/armor and artifacts. Since Daedra are clearly evil and tainted, it can be seen as bringing evil into the world and also tainting yourself by dealing with Oblivion. Of course not every character would see it like that, it depends strongly on one's worldview, but in most cases those who summon Daedra aren't exactly saint.

    Duvain said:

    But I believe that necromancy at least the necromancy used to raise people or even trap souls is what you would call bad or evil since it does harm other people. Because the person/soul is suffering during the process. That is also the reason why when a zombie dies in Skyrim they might say "Thank you" or "At last" etc. Also, I don't remember the source but it is mentioned somewhere that in Altmer society only few that have permission will are able to legit study necromancy (most likely not the standard minion making machine one) and only in order to find ways to prolong mortal lifespan, other than that it is considered evil and not sure if it is banned but they despise it nonetheless not to mention about the other races.

    It's true. And there's an important detail that the Altmeri funeral customs are designed so that their dead cannot be raised. They burn the bodies and perform special rituals. At the same time, in the same Altmer society Justiciars can use necromancy in their investigations and the use of souls in enchanting is perfectly legal as long as those souls are white.

    Even a Lawful Good character can believe that the use of white souls is no more evil than the use of animal furs and meat (maybe there are some "vegans" but they obvoiusly are a minority). Also, a person (not a Good one but Neutral maybe) can believe that studying necromancy for scientific purposes can be justified because it's for the good of the society, progress and such.

    Golden Fool said:

    I'd argue that it depends on the type of necromancy being used as to whether it is good or "evil". This discussion is a pretty good explanation of the various ways you can reanimate the dead in TES. If you don't want to read it then I'll summarise it here: first way is using the soul of the individual being raised, second is stuffing a daedra into the body, and third is more down to how you interpret the lore since it takes part of a lore book and suggests that you can raise a body with only the "energy" part of the soul and not the "person" part. So in the case of the second (and third if you like that interpretation) it's really not that much different to other conjuration spells. Oh, also the person's soul only suffers if the necromancer has to fight them for control of their body, so presumably if you are using a daedra to raise them or the third option then there would be no torment.

    The Altmer in ESO Summerset also have a spell which lets them see the final actions of the dead which they use in solving murders.

    I also like to "twist" Arkay's teachings somewhat, "Arkay's Blessing prevents the souls of men, beastmen, and elves from being used without consent." Without consent is the important part here, is it evil and immoral to raise a body of a person who has given you permission to do so? 

     

    The second method can be seen as "consorting with Daedra" by some, just like the general summoning of Daedra, and the third, while perfectly harmless, can be seen by some as disrespect toward the dead. I bet Redguards and Nords wouldn't be appeased with the explanation of the third method if they saw you doing it.

    And I have a strong suspicion that those Altmer guys who legally study necromancy can only experiment on the bodies of mer who gave their permission before they died (like wrote a special paper), or criminals who were executed, or of "lesser" races.

  • Member
    October 13, 2018

    Justiciar Thorien said:

    The second method can be seen as "consorting with Daedra" by some, just like the general summoning of Daedra, and the third, while perfectly harmless, can be seen by some as disrespect toward the dead. I bet Redguards and Nords wouldn't be appeased with the explanation of the third method if they saw you doing it.

    And I have a strong suspicion that those Altmer guys who legally study necromancy can only experiment on the bodies of mer who gave their permission before they died (like wrote a special paper), or criminals who were executed, or of "lesser" races.

    Some could certainly see it as that. I was really just trying to point out that necromancy isn't necessarily evil, like Duvain was saying it is. If anything necromancy is just another form of magic that depending on the person using can be good, neutral or evil. Sure it is more often seen in use by those we'd call evil, but that does not make the magic itself evil. This has actually got me wondering if Arkay's Blessing is a form of necromancy that both forces the soul out of the body and counteracts future attempts to raise it because the body has already been "raised".

     

  • October 13, 2018

    I agree with you, but I'm very certain that many people don't, for the sole reason that any kind of necromancy involves dead bodies. Most people think that a truly good character must honor the dead and such, and it's not entirely untrue, but I personally believe that a truly good character would hold the good of the living in a higher priority than any religious customs.

  • Member
    October 13, 2018

    I can see even Lawful Good characters using necromancy, if it was allowed by the laws they are bound to and it ended up benefiting the living.

    Completely unrelated but I remember reading about a one player dnd game where the player went around teaching necromancy to villagers so they could use the zombies for manual labor while they spent their time on education and the like. Only for the DM to use them as the "villian" for another group of players who destroyed the good he did.

  • October 13, 2018

    Golden Fool said:

    I can see even Lawful Good characters using necromancy, if it was allowed by the laws they are bound to and it ended up benefiting the living.

    The third method, yes, maybe even the second. But the first? I can't see how any good character could justify that. The Altmeri spell that they use to solve murders is the only exception I can think of.

  • Member
    October 13, 2018

    Justiciar Thorien said:

    The third method, yes, maybe even the second. But the first? I can't see how any good character could justify that. The Altmeri spell that they use to solve murders is the only exception I can think of.

    It would come down to the character and the laws that they uphold, they'd certainly be more likely to use the third and second methods. If the need was great enough and the benefit to others outwayed the cost then I could see them agreeing to it, necromancy would not be something they'd use often and there'd be conditions to it like getting the individual's permission but I can see a Good character using necromancy. For example I posted a short story some time ago where the Dragonborn opted to use the dead to help fight dragons instead of seeking assistance from the locals, since the use of necromancy was outwayed by the lives saved in the process.