Duvain said:@Mercurias - Although I can enjoy a warrior class I 'm more of a magic type of guy or something inbetween. After Healers though as I 've listed in my go to classes my 2nd favorite is also the summoner/necromancer types it's fun to play like that and feel like an one man army be it for PvE or PvP. Hm bards I do find the class interesting and have played it sometimes but I would still lean more towards something like a Nightblade if I were to chose. I'm hard to truly pin down on my favorite class. I tend to pick something new every time. In D&D I'm having a ball playing a Light Domain Cleric (basically a holy spellcaster with medium armor who specializes in blasting with divine light/fire). In Skyrim my playthrough right now is a versioon of Alastor's High Summoner using mods to make the playstyle more unique (A unique Battlemage, basically, with emphasis on Conjuration and supplemented by bound weapons). In ESO my current favorite character is an Argonian Warden (Like a druid which uses nature/beast summoning magic for offense and support). In Guild Wars 2 I played a Necromancer, only it was decked out to be a greatsword-swinging juggernaut that sucked out life from dead enemies to fuel a transformation into a scythe-wielding avatar of death. In FFXIV right now I'm playing a White Mage, which is essentially a straightforward class with massive healing bursts and moderate damage potential.   It all depends on the game. 

An MMO’s polish at launch involves a lot of different factors, but among the most important are 1) Devotion to quality before launch, 2) Clear determination of how the gameplay should be, 3) Extensive beta testing to eliminate bugs/balance issues prior to launch, and 4) making gameplay clear, simple, and fun. Fallout 76, Destiny, Destiny 2, ESO, Anthem, and a whole lot of other MMOs tend have missed at least 2 of these. Some games get so wrapped up in making an exciting story that they forget to make the game fun to play. In ESO’s case, they made a beautiful world with some interesting story, but they didn’t seem to have any clue of how to build the game to be playable and fun. I’ve seen that happen with other Zenimax games, like World of Darkness, at launch, but they did a massive amount of work to turn ESO into the cash cow it is today. Bethesda is not the team that made ESO. They tend not to fix or refine their games very far lost-launch because they’re already neck-deep in a new project. Even Skyrim Special Edition was chock full of the same bugs everyone had known about for half a decade when Bethesda released it. I don’t believe Bethesda had a pre-game devotion of quality concerning Fallout 76. I think it’s pretty obvious they had no idea what players were going to do in their game world, since they spent a lot of time telling fans and players they didn’t need to make their own fun. I don’t believe they tested Fallout 76 even remotely close to an appropriate length of time for the sheer quantity of bugs being reported. I think they spent most of their time focused on refining the gameplay and let everything else coast (including the merchandise for their collector’s edition orders). If they showed that little pride in the work on release day, I would hold no hope that Bethesda will continue working on the game now that they’ve already made money off of it.

I like playing classes that bust out big numbers, like Barbarians, Warriors, or attacking mages. My true favorite, though, is probably any mage class that can summon pets or helpers. I love how they can make you self-sufficient. If I'm playing a sneaky character, I'd just as soon play a Bard rather than a thief or assassin. 

I'm of the opinoin that Kematu is more right than Saadia is, because those Redguards seem to have a personal beef with her rather than hunting her down for a job. I'm sure none of them are giving the full story, but that's what I've inferred.

He probably wants to make TES6 another Fallout game.